16.10.09
Brand Advocacy 2.0
Source - via Youtube
A Roadmap For Collective Storytelling
The ability to tell stories has always been one of the most powerful ways to connect with other people.
Social media has given us a unique way to to tell stories as a collective. Here's a road map for collective storytelling.
Stop #1 - Define Your Story
The process of discovering what you want to tell a story about is always different, but the most important step in storytelling. You need to be an expert on what your story is about.
Starting a story without knowing what it's about will likely cause confusion. If the collective is confused by a story, it's unlikely that they'll participate in telling it.
The collective will look to that person who started the story for reinforcement and reassurance that the story is still on track. Ensure you monitor your story and continue to participate in telling it, or risk the story ending.
Stop #2 - Spark a Conversation
In collective storytelling, stories are made up of wide-reaching conversations. Those conversations begin with a 'conversation spark'.
A conversation spark shouldn't be the entire story. It should provide enough information to be provocative, but leave the next chapter of the story open to be told by the collective.
Consider the Burger King "Subservient Chicken" campaign. The story begins: A human-sized chicken has decided to set-up a webcam. It's asking that you come to it's website and give it orders.
That's an example of a conversation spark.
Stop #3 - Participate in the Conversation
Conversations spread through social media like ripples across a pond. Consider the conversation spark as the pebble dropping into the water. The ripples dissipate as they move farther away from the center, just as the conversations have less impact the longer they continue without a new conversation spark.
Ok, consider this model:
The conversation spark could be the site created for the Burger King "Subservient Chicken". The longer the campaign runs, the greater the reach will be; however, the longer the campaign runs without a new conversation spark, the less impact the conversation will have. Eventually, the conversation will end.
Note: You can't control when the conversation ends. You can only control when, and how much you participate. Here's a great set of guidelines (PDF download) for responses to changes in your story.
This model shows the first two ripples as a conversation spark begins to propagate through a network:
Of course they could have provided more tools. They could have allowed users to save a video of the chickens responses to a certain set of orders, and provide a link to send to friends. They could have created a gallery of user-generated video's of people responding to orders while wearing the downloadable chicken mask. These types of tools could help to extend the story.
Stop #4 - Extend the Story
A story could end after one conversation spark; but the best stories continue. As new conversation sparks are created and added to the story; the story grows, and reaches more people.
Innovative and provocative stories are often enough to inspire other storytellers to create their own conversation spark. Take the "Subservient Chicken" example again. It inspired this YouTube video, which reached over 2,000 people and got 7 comments. Not a huge conversation, but extending the story often includes conversations of many sizes.
Collective storytelling isn't necessarily about branding, or making money; it's about spreading a message and allowing that message to be malleable enough to be changed by its audience while maintaining its integrity.
Source - The Jordan Rules
Still Think Social Media Is A Fad?
Source - The Economist via Youtube
Emotion > Rational
The idea that ads that engage us emotionally work better than those that don’t might provoke a, “Well, duhhh!” reaction from Neuromarketing readers. Surprisingly, though, I still encounter business executives who don’t believe they are swayed by emotional factors when buying things, and often doubt that others are either. So, for those uber-rational decision-makers, here’s the hard data…
Earlier this month, I based a few discussions on the book Brand Immortality by Pringle and Field. The last finding from that book that I’ll share with you is an analysis of data from the IPA (the UK-based Institute of Practitioners in Advertising). The IPA dataBANK contains 1400 case studies of successful advertising campaigns submitted for the IPA Effectiveness Award competition over the last three decades. This particular analysis of the IPA data compared the profitability boost of campaigns which relied primarity on emotional appeal vs. those which used rational persuasion and information. The chart above shows the results. Campaigns with purely emotional content performed about twice as well (31% vs. 16%) with only rational content, and those that were purely emotional did a little better (31% vs 26%) those that mixed emotional and rational content.
Pringle and Field attribute this split to our brain’s ability to process emotional input without cognitive processing (or even awareness – see Low Attention Branding), as well as our brain’s more powerful recording of emotional stimuli.
The authors note that while an emotional marketing campaign may be more effective, creating ads that engage consumer emotions isn’t easy. By comparision, basing a campaign on a “killer fact” (if a brand has such an advantage) is comparatively simple. Indeed, brands have damaged themselves when an emotional campaign failed to align with reality. Pringle and Field suggest that committing to an emotional branding approach be “hard-wired into the fabric of the brand,” which requires a major commitment as well as good understanding of consumer motivation. They cite Nike’s pervasive theme of “success in sport” as an example of a brand that focuses on a key emotional driver and builds advertising, sponsorships, etc. around it.
Smaller brands may not be able to follow the same emotional branding approach as the market leaders, Pringle and Field note, but may be able to segment the market to find a group of consumers that will respond to a different appeal. Ben & Jerry’s and Jones Soda, for example, aren’t the biggest players in their markets but have achieved success by appealing to smaller segments of consumers.
Smaller entities face several addtional challenges. Their name recognition is likely much lower, and an emotion-based campaign may befuddle consumers who don’t even associate the brand and product category. Budweiser can run amusing and engaging commercials about Clydesdales and Dalmations because 100% of the audience knows their products. A small business might well have to take the “combined” rational and emotional approach even if it is slightly less effective, or at least ensure that their emotion-based ads clearly identify the product.
Emotion-based ads may be more difficult to create, but the stats say it’s worth the effort.
Source - NeuromarketingDigitalinguistics
Everyone knows the number one rule of social media engagement is to be honest, and everyone knows the number two rule is don't start something you can't finish (as in, don't start a celebrity Twitter account and write in it for two days and then not write anything in it again, because you end up looking like a dick).
In fact, the rules of social media engagement are so well-known these days that pretty much everyone can recite them by heart, even rule number 14a which is:
"Don't try and talk like you're Gen Y because you're not, unless you are, and even then you shouldn't be twittering on behalf of the company yet because you're not responsible enough and if you get access to Twitter you'll want access to Facebook as well and you'll claim it's for work but we know, and you know, and we know you know we know that you'll end up spending most of your day updating your status, playing Mob Wars and LOL'ing with your BFFs".
Well to hell with that rule.
For the first time, ever*, thanks to the vivacious, spacious and audacious wit of LOL-linguist-intern-strategists, @anna_goddard and @AnnabelBrusasco, myself, a list of words Dialogix couldn't define and a little too much time, Marketingmag.com.au is able to bring you the official GenY LOLspeak A-Z Dictionary of the 65 Most Popular Young Person's Colloquialisms. Or, The Gen Y Translator for short. Rule 14a be damned.
Thanks to The LOLspeak Dictionary even the most moronic of marketing managers can now converse with the kewlest of lolcats. Fire up that Facebook chat window, update your MySpace pic and energise your emoticons, let's start totes talkin!
Oh, and if I've left off any LOLisms you feel should be included in the next edition, feel free to add them in the comments below...
*As long as you don't count the Urban Dictionary as ever
Word | Definition | Example Usage |
!!!!! | Words cannot express how much I think this is totally amazing | OMG!!!!! |
@ | At | |
*action* | Right now I am doing whatever is between the asterisks | This LOLspeak dictionary is going to be out of date before it's published but that's kewl. *shrugs* |
#fail | That didn't go very well at all | Did you hear she was trying to get around the world, only made it as far as North Straddie and got hit by a tanker! #sailingfail |
aiight | Alright | A: "Sorry I ran over your cat with my car." B: "That's aiight, it was my sister's cat." |
b4 | Before | |
BF, B/F | Boyfriend | |
BFF | Best Friend(s) Forever | |
biatch | My dear friend | Sup biatch! |
boi | Boy | |
brb | Be Right Back | |
BTW | By The Way | |
burn | To denigrate | At least I wasn't vomiting in the garden! Burn! |
CBA | Stands for 'Can't Be Arsed', meaning 'I could not be bothered | CBA going out tonight. Stayin' at home watchin' Idol. |
C-Bomb | The worst swear word you can possibly use | I accidentally dropped the c-bomb in front of my Mum last night and got grounded for a week. |
dats | That's | |
defs/defso | Definitely | Defs wanna hit the clubs tonight. |
DM | Direct Message/Direct Mail | OMG the boss is coming, have to get off the phone, DM me! |
DW | Don't worry | |
everybunny | Everybody | |
FML | F--- My Life | Today, my first girlfriend of over 3 years left me for another guy. She said she's looking for someone who can financially provide for her in the future. The dude owns a mobile phone kiosk. I'm going to medical school. FML |
fo shiz | For certain | A: "Wanna smoke some weed and listen to Snoop Dogg?" B: "Fo shiz." |
FPP | Facebook Profile Picture | You look hot! You should defs make that your FPP! |
G2G | Got To Go | |
GF, G/F | Girlfriend | |
Ghost Tweeter | Someone who writes or fine-tunes someone else's Twitter updates because the person in question is too busy, dumb or unfunny to do it themselves | That's not really Kyle Sandilands on Twitter. It's a ghost tweeter. |
Hellz Yeah | Yes, yes indeed | And so the cop told me that my party was the most epic party they'd ever been called to... Hellz Yeah! |
HTFU | Harden the F--- Up! | A: "Really tired hey, don't know if I'm coming out tonight." B: "HTFU!" |
ish | Sort of | She was good-looking...ish. |
kewl | Cool | |
KK | OK, OK | A: "Can I borrow your jeans tonight?" B:"kk" |
L8 | Late | |
Laterz | Later | "Bye", "Yeah, no worries, laterz" |
LMAO | Laughing My Arse Off | |
LOL | Laugh Out Loud | |
LOLZ | That's so funny | |
LOLGASM | The climax of a particularly effervescent LOL incident | |
LOLWAT | Disbelief to the point of absurdity | |
Maggot | Exceptionally drunk | Going to Jake's house tonight. Going to get MAGGOT! |
Mofo | A term of endearment between mates. Short for motherf---er | |
n00b | Someone who is new to something, usually in an internet forum | |
OMFG! | Oh My F---ing God! | A: "She let me sleep with her!" B: "OMFG!" |
OMG | Oh My God! | |
Owned | Defeated | |
Peeps | People | |
PPL | People | |
QFT | Quoted For Truth | You said that and we all heard it. QFT |
Redic | Ridiculous | |
Redonkulous | That is seriously ridiculous | |
ROFL | Rolling On the Floor Laughing | |
ROFLCOPTER | Rolling On the Floor Laughing, spinning around like helicopter blades | A: "So I was just driving high and I stopped to let a pinecone cross the road because I thought it was a hedgehog." B: "ROFLCOPTER" |
Sick | Really, really good | |
Siff | As if, that couldn't possibly be true | |
STFU | Shut The F--- Up! | |
Sup | Hello, how are you? Or, What's wrong? | |
Tomoz | Tomorrow | A: "So I think I'm going to break up with her tomoz." B: "No way!" |
Totes | Short for totally, as in, most definitely | That comment was totes inapprop. |
TTYL | Talk To You Later | |
U | You | |
V | Very | V.Good |
Woot | Gamer-talk for woo-hoo | I got to the last level on Final Fantasy VII, Woot! |
WTF | What The F---? | The doctor took one look and he was, like, WTF? |
XXL | Someone with a rotund figure | |
Yeeeewww/ Yeow/ Yiew | An expression of great joy | |
ZOMG | A more sarcastic expression than OMG Source - Marketing Mag |
Science Of A RT (Re-Tweet)
If I wanted to make sure this post did not go viral--according to the standards put forth by Hubspot viral marketing scientist Dan Zarrella in "The Science of Retweeting"--I could promote it on Twitter by posting something like this:
was bored watchin the game on tv and saw this thing about RTs...made me lol after i had really bad stomach cramps
Note the lack of punctuation, the use of of slang and abbreviations, the limited vocabulary, and the awkward overshare--all traits that Zarrella can now definitively say would turn Twitter users off. How? Because the avid Twitter-er and author of the upcoming The Social Media Marketing Book spent nine months analyzing roughly 5 million tweets and 40 million retweets (which are usually symbolized with an "RT" on Twitter). He noted when they were posted, which words they used, whether or not they included links, and more. Then, he says, he compared the two groups to get the first "real window" into how ideas spread from person to person: "Retweets may seem like a small idea...but many of the lessons [they teach us] will be applicable to viral ideas in other mediums."
The full report is 22 pages, and won't be available until tomorrow (UPDATE: It's here). But Zarrella offered me a sneak peak--via Twitter, no less. Below, his nine most effective ways to get retweeted on Twitter:
1. Link Up (But Don't Use TinyURLs)
In Zarrella's sample, links were three times more prevalent in RTs than normal tweets (19% to 57%), suggesting that their mere prescence could help buoy your bon mots. (Not sure whether that holds true for sporadic use of French terms.) But choose your URL shortener carefully: Newer, shorter services, such as bit.ly, ow.ly, and is.gd, were much likelier to get retweeted than older, longer services, such as TinyURL. Ouch.
2. Beggars Can Be Choosers
Although conventional wisdom suggests that SPAMmy pleas, such as "PLEASE RETWEET," would be generally ignored, Zarrella found the opposite. "Please" and "retweet" were his third and fourth "most retweetable" words, preceeded only by "Twitter" (duh) and "you." Also worth noting: "Check out" and "new blog post" were Nos. 19 and 20, respectively.
3. Avoid Idle Chit-Chat
Okay, let's face it: We all occasionally tweet about "boring" activities, such as sleeping and watching TV. But alas, these are the types of words and phrases Zarrella dubs "least retweetable." "There are a number of '-ing' verbs, including 'going,' 'watching' and 'listen-ing,'" that were not retweeted very often, he writes. Translation: Unless you've got a really interesting life--Shaquille O'Neal, anyone?--do not legitimately answer Twitter's "What are you doing?" prompt.
4. Don't Be Stupid
So much for abbrevs and emoticons. :-( Zarrella's RTs not only have more syllables per word than normal tweets (1.62 vs. 1.58), but they're also more intellectual: Per a Flesch-Kincaid test, comprehending RTs requires 6.47 years of education, while normal tweets require just 6.04.
A whopping 98% of RTs contain some form of punctuation (compared with 86% of normal tweets), with colons, periods, exclamation points, commas, and hyphens leading the way. (Where you at, question mark??) But Zarrella really sticks it to semicolons, calling them "the only unretweetable punctuation mark."
6. Break News
This one's kind of a no-brainer, but original content is way more popular than stuff we've already read: The words in Zavella's normal-tweet sample were each found 89 times in other tweets, on average, while words in the RTs were found just 16 times.
7. Use Proper Nouns Properly
Most RTs were heavier on nouns, proper nouns and 3rd-person verbs, suggesting that headline-style tweets--such as "Lindsay Lohan Escapes From Rehab Facility"--are more likely to go viral.
8. Bottle Those Emotions
Sorry guys, but nobody wants to promote your f---ing, stupid feelings: Tweets about work, religion, money and media/celebrities are more retweetable than those involving negative emotions, sensations, swear words, and self-reference.
9. Tweet at 4 p.m. on Friday
'Nuff said.
Source - Fast Company
I Heart Infographics
For the Trendsmap click here
For more Twitter infographics here.